THRIVING after the FALL
Book One FEASTING after the FALL

The Log · FEASTING · Read the chapter

Chapter 1: The Rhythm of the Hearth

40 claims, 8 marked for safety

H1 Safety amended Story, Honest Broker; Bench 3 (never unattended)

No fire is lit indoors without a chimney; wood smoke is fine particles and CO; three-stone kitchens kill through the lungs; a wood-burning house has twice the fine dust of its neighbour

To check against
WHO household air pollution figures (about 3.2 million deaths a year); doc 115 (196 % PM2.5); confirm "twice"
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollut… (WHO fact sheet, 2025); sheffield.ac.uk/news/indoor-wood-stoves-release-harmful-e… (Chakraborty et al. 2020, Atmosphere 11:1326, +196.23 % daily PM2.5 via search abstract); epa.gov/burnwise/wood-smoke-and-your-health
Note
WHO now gives 2.9 million deaths a year (2021), not 3.2 million, and more than half are heart disease and stroke (32 % + 23 %), not lung deaths; no source supports "more than through hunger". The 196 % is a rise within the same homes when the stove burns versus when it is cold (about three times), not a comparison with a neighbour. Proposed: "The world's poorest kitchens, where the pot sits on three stones over an open flame, kill nearly three million people a year through the heart and lungs, and a house in a rich country has about three times the fine dust in its air on the days its wood stove burns as on the days it is cold."
H2 Safety amended Story, Smoke, tar and the sweep; Bench 1, step 6; If it goes wrong

Creosote lays down when flue gas cools below about 120 °C; a chimney fire runs at about 1,000 °C, cracks the liner and fires the roof; cures: dry wood, hot fast fires, never close the damper on a flaming fire, sweep

To check against
doc 21 (120 °C, 1,093 °C); doc 115; Schornsteinfeger guidance
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
Univ. of Idaho Extension CIS 480 (T. J. Karsky, Wood as a Fuel series), reproduced at cookstoves.net/articles/creosote-problem-chimney-fires-ch… ; schornsteinfegermeister.de/schornsteinfeger-informationen… ; feuerwehr-marburg.de/aktuelles/buergerinformationen/richt… ; doc 21 p.10 (120 °C/250 °F, 2000 °F)
Note
Creosote below 250 °F (121 °C): confirmed. Chimney fire temperature: sources say over 1,000 °C (Schornsteinfeger), up to 1,400 °C (Feuerwehr Marburg), 2,000 to 3,000 °F (Idaho); "about a thousand" understates. Causes listed by the Schornsteinfeger (wet fuel, glanzruß, starved air) match the cures. Proposed: "A chimney fire runs at well over a thousand degrees, roars like a train, cracks the flue liner and sets the roof timbers alight."
H3 Safety confirmed If it goes wrong

Chimney fire response: shut damper and stove door, get everyone out, call for help, do not open the flue; inspection before reuse

To check against
Berlin fire brigade guidance on Schornsteinbrand; confirm "shut the damper" is the advice (some say leave the stove door shut, damper open is wrong)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
feuerwehr-marburg.de/aktuelles/buergerinformationen/richt… ; livermorefireco.gov/chimney-fires ; schornsteinfegermeister.de/schornsteinfeger-informationen…
Note
Fire services say: take the stove out of use, close its air openings and flaps (Klappen), call 112, get everyone out, have flue and stove checked before reuse. Closing the damper is the advice (Livermore: "Close the damper"). Two items the draft omits and should add: never water (1 l becomes about 1,700 l of steam and bursts the flue) and pull furniture away from the chimney breast. Berliner Fe...
H4 Safety amended Bench 1, step 6

Bank a fire only when nothing flames; damper mostly closed; ash a finger thick over the heap; relights after eight hours

To check against
doc 115 (damper rule); hearth-cooking practice (banking); CO risk of a banked fire in a closed room must be stated or the step changed to "chimney open"
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2005/CPSC-Warns-Of-Hazard… ; cpsc.gov/safety-education/safety-education-centers/carbon… ; doc 115 (damper open while flaming)
Note
CPSC: "Never close the damper before going to bed if the ashes are still warm"; keep it open "until the ashes are cool". A banked fire is warm ashes by design, so "close the damper most of the way" is the CO case the regulator warns against. Ash a finger thick and relight after eight hours found in no source (book's own practice). Proposed step: "At night, rake the coals into a heap at the back and cover them with their own ash a finger thick, and leave the damper open, because a banked fire still makes carbon monoxide and a closed flue sends it into the room where people sleep."
H5 Safety amended Bench 2, step 5; If it goes wrong

Never fire a wet cob oven hard: steam blows the dome apart; cement mortar fails above 300 °C

To check against
doc 20 (Portland dehydrates above 300 °C, fails by 500 °C); cob oven builders (Denzer, Build Your Own Earth Oven)
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
Kiko Denzer, "The Simple Art of Making an Earth Oven", dirtcheapbuilder.com/Articles/Make_Earth_Oven.htm ; F1000Research 2026, doi 10.12688/f1000research.175541.1, pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13554995 (plain cement mortar keeps 89.6 % strength at 200 °C, 59.7 % at 400 °C, 19.1 % at 600 °C); doc 20 p.6-7
Note
Denzer: dry for weeks or with small fires; cracking on firing is normal; nothing on steam blowing a dome apart. Cement: dehydration of Ca(OH)2 at 400 to 500 °C, sharp strength loss above 400 °C; "fails above 300 °C" is the library's rounding. Proposed: "Never fire a wet cob oven hard: the water in the clay turns to steam and cracks the dome, so dry it for weeks or with small fires first; a brick oven laid in cement mortar loses much of its strength above 400 °C and most of it by 600 °C, and must be rebuilt with clay or refractory mortar."
H6 Safety amended Bench 3

Rocket stove: never leave unattended; sticks no thicker than a thumb; pot 2 cm above the riser mouth on iron feet

To check against
doc 21; Aprovecho design principles
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
Aprovecho Research Center, Design Principles for Wood Burning Cook Stoves (PCIA/EPA, Shell Foundation), bioenergylists.org/stovesdoc/Pcia/Design%20Principles%20f… pp.13, 21-25
Note
Aprovecho: the gap under the pot must keep the same cross-section as the chimney (area / circumference); its worked example for a 12 cm chamber needs 3.0 cm and warns 2 cm "reducing the draft and increasing the production of smoke". The book's 15 cm square riser (225 cm², 60 cm perimeter) needs about 4 cm, not 2 cm. Skirt gap (same step): Baldwin via Aprovecho gives 11 mm under 1 kg wood/h, 13 mm at 1.5 kg/h, 15 mm at 2 kg/h; the book's stove burns 1 kg in half an hour (2 kg/h), so 8 mm is too tight. Skirt saves 25 to 30 % fuel, not "doubles the heat". Burn-the-tips principle supports feeding sticks so only ends burn; "thumb" thickness and "never unattended" are the book's own and sound. Proposed: "Set the pot on three iron feet about 4 cm above the riser's mouth, so the gap under it is as large as the riser itself, and put a skirt around it with a gap of about 15 mm."
H7 Safety amended Bench 4, step 5

Do not spread stove ash on the woodlot or garden: it carries metals from the city's air

To check against
docs 119, 123 (UBA, BBodSchV); note that clean rural wood ash is used as a garden liming agent, so the rule is Berlin-specific
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
umweltbundesamt.de/umwelttipps-fuer-den-alltag/kaminofen-… (UBA)
Note
UBA: cooled ash goes in the residual waste; "Für Garten und Kompost ist sie nicht geeignet" because of heavy metals "die natürlich im Holz vorhanden sind" and PAHs from burning. So the rule is general in Germany, not Berlin-specific, and the reason is metals every tree takes up plus combustion tars, not only city air. Proposed: "Do not spread the stove ash on it or on the garden, because ash concentrates the metals every tree draws from soil and air, and the tars of the fire."
H8 Safety confirmed Story, Arithmetic; Honest Broker

Charcoal brazier in the yard for summer cooking, 25 % efficiency; no charcoal burned indoors at all because it makes CO without smoke to warn of it

To check against
doc 119; CO deaths from indoor charcoal (CDC, RKI case reports)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
cdc.gov/carbon-monoxide/about/index.html (CDC); cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2005/CPSC-Warns-Of-Hazard… ; doc 119 (15 to 30 %)
Note
CDC: CO "odorless, colorless", "Never burn charcoal indoors. Burning charcoal - red, gray, black, or white - gives off CO"; CPSC: never use charcoal in a fireplace. The 25 % brazier efficiency is inside doc 119's 15 to 30 % range (its ref 20 not opened); non-safety figure, library-only.
H9 confirmed Story, What the fire made

Humans alone cook; small mouth, small teeth, short gut, brain uses a fifth of intake; Wrangham 2009 argued cooking preceded the big brain; disputed, not overturned

To check against
Wrangham, Catching Fire (2009); brain about 20 % of resting energy; critiques (e.g. Cornélio et al. 2016)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
Wrangham, *Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human* (2009), en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catching_Fire:_How_Cooking_Made_Us_… ; brain ~20-25% of RMR vs 8-9% in other primates (multiple summaries of Aiello & Wheeler's expensive-tissue framing); Cornélio et al. 2016, *Frontiers in Neuroscience*, frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fn…
Note
Cornélio et al. found no clear energetic gain from cooked meat in their experiments, challenging but not overturning Wrangham's thesis — "disputed, not overturned" is fair.
H10 confirmed Story, The coal bed

Open hearth sends 80 to 90 % of heat up the chimney and drags cold air in

To check against
doc 115; Rumford's own essays
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 115 p. (Hearth Cooking Techniques Analysis); thisoldhouse.com/fireplaces/one-hot-fireplace ; thecraftsmanblog.com/what-is-a-rumford-fireplace/
Note
80–90% figure is a widely repeated modern engineering estimate for traditional open fireplaces; I could not find Rumford himself stating this exact percentage in the essays excerpted online — he wrote qualitatively about wasted heat and redesigned the firebox/throat. Wording is fine attributed to the physics, not necessarily "Rumford's own essays."
H11 confirmed Story; Bench 1, step 4

Coals radiate; radiance falls with the square of distance; three heats sorted by size

To check against
doc 115
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 115 (three coal grades: high/walnut-medium/pea-low; explicit "intensity of radiant heat flux follows the inverse-square law")
Note
Standard radiative-physics inverse-square law; doc's three-tier coal classification matches the book's "three heats sorted by size."
H12 confirmed Story, The coal bed

Spider on three legs; Dutch oven with rimmed lid, twice the coals above as below; salamander as ancestor of the grill

To check against
doc 115 (2:1 or 3:1 lid to base); hearth-cooking references
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 115 (spider: three-legged cast-iron skillet, definitionally stable; Dutch oven ratio example "17 coals on lid / 8 beneath" scaling to "19/10" ≈ 2:1 top:bottom; salamander section)
Note
The "twice the coals above as below" matches the doc's own worked examples (≈2:1, not an exact universal rule). "Salamander as ancestor of the grill" is loose — salamander is technically a top-down broiler, but modern commercial units are colloquially called "salamander grills" (see wasserstrom.com/blog/2019/01/18/salamander-broiler-explai…), so the lineage claim is defensible if...
H13 confirmed Story, The coal bed

Hannah Glasse 1747, dripping pan "very clean and nice" for a roasting hare; William Kitchiner, Cook's Oracle 1817, pulse of 100,800 beats a day as a timer, physician with a fortune

To check against
Glasse 1747 text; Kitchiner 1817 (Gutenberg 28681); Kitchiner biography
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
Glasse, *The Art of Cookery Made Plain and Easy* (1747) — quote "Dripping-pan must be very clean and nice" verified via barrypopik.com/blog/if_you_want_to_have_rabbit_stew_first… and archive.org copies of the 1747 text; Kitchiner, *Cook's Oracle* (1817), physician confirmed via en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography,_1885-1900/Kitchiner,_William (inherited ≈£60,000 from his coal-merchant father, M.D., independent of practice)
Note
The specific "pulse of 100,800 beats a day as a timer" detail comes from doc 115's own source (fiftywordsforsnow.com/ebooks/kitchiner), which returned 403 Forbidden when I tried to open it directly, and I could not locate the exact figure in the Gutenberg text (search tooling may have missed it in a very long file) or via general web search. Everything else in the row is solidly confirmed; this...
H14 confirmed Story, The coal bed

Turnspit dog: bred for a wall wheel, worked in shifts, mentioned by Darwin, extinct in the 19th century; spit boy behind wet hay

To check against
doc 115; Darwin, Variation under Domestication; histories of the turnspit
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnspit_dog ; Darwin, *The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication* (1868) lists the turnspit among long-established breeds, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Variation_of_Animals_and_Plants… ; doc 115 (wet-hay detail, wheel mounted on kitchen wall, worked in shifts)
Note
Breed declared extinct by the end of the 19th century, consistent with the row.
H15 confirmed Story, The coal bed

Rumford: American loyalist, Bavarian service, count; 1790s fireplace with shallow firebox, angled sides, narrow throat, smoke shelf

To check against
Rumford, Essay IV on chimney fireplaces (1796); biography
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Thompson (American-born Loyalist, Bavarian war/police minister, made Count of the Holy Roman Empire 1791, chose the title "Rumford"); Rumford fireplace redesign summarized at thecraftsmanblog.com/what-is-a-rumford-fireplace/
Note
Essay IV, "Of Chimney Fireplaces," is the correctly named 1796 essay; shallow firebox/angled sides/narrowed throat description matches standard accounts. Did not independently verify "smoke shelf" wording in Rumford's own text (this is now a generic fireplace term); flag as a minor point only.
H16 confirmed Story, The oven; Bench 2, step 4; Numbers

Heat soaks into firebrick at about an inch an hour; a 3-inch dome charges in 90 minutes and bakes for a day; door 63 % of dome height

To check against
doc 20
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 20 (Wood-Fired Masonry Oven Architecture): "heat to penetrate deeply into the brick at a rate of approximately one inch per hour"; "brick thickness of 3 to 4 inches ... fully charging within a standard firing window (60 to 90 minutes) ... storing enough energy to bake consecutive batches ... over 24 hours"; "63% Dome-to-Door Height Ratio"
Note
Figures match the row exactly. Cross-row note: doc 20's own numbers are internally inconsistent — a 1 inch/hour soak rate implies a 3-inch dome needs ~3 hours to fully charge, not 90 minutes as the same document also states. The book's "3-inch dome ... 90 minutes" follows the doc's stated charging-window figure, not a computation from the 1 in/hr rate; worth flagging to the writing session as a...
H17 confirmed Story, The oven

Pompeii buried 33 bakeries with domed ovens, bread in some

To check against
doc 20 (33 ovens); Pompeii archaeology (carbonised loaves, Modestus bakery)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 20 citing 33 domed clay ovens with chimneys excavated at Pompeii; corroborated generally by archaeology.org/issues/july-august-2019/collection/pompei… (about 33-35 bakeries) and the well-documented Bakery of Modestus, where 81 carbonised loaves were found in 1862 (thevintagenews.com/2018/07/07/ancient-bread/)
Note
"33" and "bread in some" both check out; general sources sometimes round to "about 35" bakeries total, but 33 with domed ovens/chimneys specifically is the figure doc 20 and its cited source use.
H18 confirmed Story, The oven

Count Johann VI of Nassau-Dillenburg, mid-16th century, ordered communal bakehouses to save wood and prevent fires; the Backhaus rhythm

To check against
doc 20; Hessian Backhaus histories (Backhauskultur)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_VI,_Count_of_Nassau-Dillenburg background; ordinance text summarized at Westerwald regional heritage pages, e.g. westerwald.info/en/d/backhaus-niederweidbach-1/ — Count Johann VI's 1562 "Wood and Forest Ordinance" mandated communal bakehouses "in every village," explicitly to save wood and reduce fire risk to timber-framed farms; doc 20
Note
Exact date found: 18 January 1562 (mid-16th century, as claimed).
H19 confirmed Story; Numbers

About 0.9 kg wood per kg flour in a direct oven, 0.55 in an insulated one; a village that bakes together burns a third of the wood

To check against
doc 20 (Chalmers bakery oven study); the "a third" is the book's own inference and needs a source or softening
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 20 citing Chalmers Publication Library, "Efficiency of a Wood-Fired Bakery Oven," publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/203999/2039… — "as high as 0.90 kg of wood per kg of flour" (direct/semi-direct) vs "0.55 kg of wood per kg of flour" (insulated indirect)
Note
Both figures match the row exactly. The "village that bakes together burns a third of the wood" inference: (0.90-0.55)/0.90 ≈ 39%, i.e. saves *more* than a third, not exactly a third — the book's own arithmetic is in the right direction but a shade conservative; consider "over a third" or "two-fifths" as tighter wording.
H20 confirmed Story, The wood

Carlowitz 1713, Sylvicultura oeconomica, Freiberg mines, "nachhaltend"; Hartig and Cotta, Tharandt

To check against
Carlowitz 1713; Grober, Die Entdeckung der Nachhaltigkeit; Cotta's Tharandt academy 1811
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
Hans Carl von Carlowitz, *Sylvicultura oeconomica* (1713), en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Carl_von_Carlowitz and environmentandsociety.org/tools/keywords/hans-carl-von-ca… (Freiberg mining administrator; coined "nachhaltende Nutzung"); Heinrich Cotta founded the Tharandt forestry academy in 1811 with Georg Ludwig Hartig as co-pioneer of sustained-yield forestry, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Cotta
Note
All names, dates and the Freiberg/mining link confirmed.
H21 confirmed Story, The wood

Holznot debate: real in places, exaggerated by governments; Brandenburg pine planted by the square mile from the 18th century because nothing else pays on sand

To check against
Radkau, Holz; doc 3; Brandenburg forest history (Kiefer share about 70 %)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holznot and the Radkau revisionist debate (summarized via search of forest-history literature: Radkau argued 18th-century wood-shortage rhetoric was partly a tool of state control; the current consensus is "no general scarcity, but local episodes where access became critical" — matching "real in places, exaggerated by governments"); Brandenburg pine share rising from 36% (1780) to over 70% (2010) on sandy soils, planted from the 18th century, per Oxford Academic *Forestry* journal study (academic.oup.com/forestry/article/90/2/174/2527531)
Note
Both halves of the row check out against independent sources beyond doc 3.
H22 confirmed Story, The wood; Bench 4, step 5

Coppice: stumps resprout, 20-year cycle, stools live centuries; Mittelwald with oak standards; 400,000 ha in 1927 to 5,000 now

To check against
doc 123; coppice literature
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 123 (Berlin Woodlot Sustainable Harvest Plan): "utilization of CWS and simple coppice systems... plummeted by over 98% between 1927 and 2020... dropping from approximately 400,000 hectares to roughly 5,000 hectares"; Mittelwald (coppice-with-standards) terminology confirmed
Note
Figures match exactly. "Stools live centuries" and 20-year cycle are standard coppice-literature claims (e.g. NW-FVA Mittelwald publications cited in doc 123) and not separately disputed.
H23 confirmed Story, The wood

Tiergarten felled 1945 to 1947 with Holzsammelschein permits, potatoes between stumps; about 200,000 trees to a few hundred; replanted from 1949 with saplings from West German cities

To check against
Berlin Senate Tiergarten history; Wikipedia gives about 200,000 trees before and about 700 after; the "few hundred" wording should match the source found
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiergarten_(Berlin) — roughly 200,000 trees before the war, ~700 surviving by 1946/47; replanting campaign began 1949 with saplings donated from across (West) Germany, ~250,000 saplings 1949-1959; potato/vegetable cultivation on the cleared ground documented via hdg.de/lemo/bestand/objekt/foto-gemueseanbau-tiergarten.html and mittendran.de/erst-kahlschlag-dann-gemuesegarten/
Note
"A few hundred" is a fair rounding of "~700." Could not independently confirm the specific term "Holzsammelschein" (wood-collection permit) in the sources I reached, though rationed/permitted wood-gathering in postwar Berlin is well attested generally; flagging as a minor unverified detail, not a contradiction.
H24 confirmed Story, Arithmetic; Numbers

Household: 116 m², 11,600 kWh heating, 3,200 hot water, 800 cooking

To check against
doc 119 (internal contradictions noted in the chapter notes); DIN EN 12831; Destatis
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 119 (Household Annual Biomass Calculation): "living area of 116 square meters ... 11,600 kilowatt-hours per year" (space heating); "total annual DHW demand of 3,200 kilowatt-hours"; "cooking requires approximately 200 kWh/person/year... family of four... 800 kilowatt-hours"
Note
All three figures (116 m², 11,600, 3,200, 800) match the doc exactly.
H25 confirmed Story, Arithmetic; Numbers

Stove efficiencies: masonry 85 %, steel 50 %, cookstove 75 %, brazier 25 %; charcoal a quarter of its wood; summer kWh costs sixteen times its weight in wood

To check against
doc 119; the "sixteen times" is 4 x 4 and is the book's own arithmetic
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 119: masonry Grundofen "85% and 90%" thermal efficiency; convection/steel stoves lose "up to 50% of their generated energy" (i.e. ~50% net); wood cookstove "70% to 75%" (book uses 75, the upper bound); charcoal brazier assumed at a "25% efficiency threshold" (doc's own working range is 15–30%, book uses the doc's chosen baseline of 25); charcoal yield modelled at "a standard 25% gravimetric yield" (a quarter of its wood)
Note
All figures track doc 119's own numbers or its chosen baseline within a stated range. "Sixteen times its weight in wood" (summer kWh vs wood) is explicitly the book's own multiplication (4× wood-to-charcoal loss × 4× the ~25% stove efficiency) and is arithmetically consistent with the doc's other figures, though not itself stated in the doc.
H26 confirmed Story, Arithmetic; Numbers

7.7 t seasoned beech a year: 4.2 t stove wood plus 3.5 t for 870 kg charcoal; 480 kg per Ster; about 16 Ster

To check against
doc 119 (7,689 kg; table's Ster figure inconsistent with its own 1 Fm = 1.4 Rm); LWF Merkblatt 20
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 119: total "7,689 kilograms" raw beech, split "4,202 kg" (direct) + "3,487 kg" (charcoal wood, yielding "871.7 kilograms" ≈ 870 kg charcoal); Raummeter (Ster) weight "approximately 460 to 480 kilograms"; total "approximately 16 Raummeters (Sters)"
Note
All figures match. Cross-row note, as the row itself already flags: doc 119's own conversion table is internally inconsistent — it states "1 Festmeter = 1.4 Raummeter" but its own table converts 10.3 Fm into 15.9 Rm (a ratio of 1.54, not 1.4); 10.3 × 1.4 would give 14.4 Rm, not 15.9. This is a genuine arithmetic slip in the source document, not something the book introduced, but the "about 16 S...
H27 confirmed Story, Arithmetic

3 to 5 hours per solid cubic metre to fell, split, stack; 30 to 50 hours a year, October to February

To check against
doc 123 (TFZ time studies)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 123 (Berlin Woodlot Sustainable Harvest Plan), citing TFZ Bayern time studies: "between 2.3 and 5.0 labor hours per Festmeter"; "between 24 and 52 hours of intense physical labor, strictly concentrated within the legal winter harvesting window"
Note
Doc's actual range is 2.3–5.0 h/Fm and 24–52 h/year; the book narrows this slightly to "3 to 5" and "30 to 50" — both narrowed ranges sit comfortably inside the doc's range, so this is a safe rounding rather than a distortion.
H28 confirmed Story, Arithmetic; Numbers

Beech forest 10 to 11 m³/ha/a; coppice on sand 7; a hectare and a bit or a hectare and a half per family; 90 to 115 ha per village of 300

To check against
docs 119, 123; Bundeswaldinventur
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 123: coppice-on-sand increment "a highly conservative increment estimate of 7.0 [m³/ha/a]"; woodlot area "strictly calculated at 1.5 hectares" per household; Bundeswaldinventur-based beech MAI ~11.7 m³/ha/a over 1987-2002 (literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn055598.pdf)
Note
"Coppice on sand 7" and "hectare and a half per family" both match doc 123 exactly; standing beech-forest growth of 10-11 m³/ha/a is corroborated independently by the Thünen Institute figure of 11.74 m³/ha/a. For a village of 300 (≈75 four-person households) at 1.5 ha each, that is 112.5 ha — within the stated "90 to 115 ha" range.
H29 amended Story, Arithmetic

Berlin 3.5 million people; Tiergarten 210 ha; Grunewald 3,000 ha

To check against
Berlin statistics; Tiergarten 210 ha; Grunewald about 3,000 ha
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Berlin ; Berlin.de population figures — end-2025 population reported at roughly 3.7–3.85 million and still growing, with official forecasts projecting past 4 million; Tiergarten 210 ha and Grunewald 3,000 ha both confirmed exactly, e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiergarten_(park) and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grunewald_(forest)
Note
Tiergarten and Grunewald areas check out precisely. "3.5 million people" is now noticeably low for present-day Berlin (current population is closer to 3.7–3.85 million); propose either "roughly 3.8 million" or note the 3.5 million figure as the population around the early 2010s.
H30 amended Story, Honest Broker

A coppice takes twenty years to yield; a flat insulated to post-2009 standard needs a third of the heat; straw in the roof and felt in the frames cut wood from 16 Ster to 6

To check against
doc 123; doc 119 (30 to 38 vs 100 kWh/m²a); the 16-to-6 example is the book's own and is generous; recompute or soften
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
doc 123 (20-year coppice rotation, matches H22); doc 119: post-2009 (GEG/EnEV) standard "30-38 kWh/m²a" vs the baseline "100 kilowatt-hours per square meter per year" used for the household model
Note
The "needs a third of the heat" claim for a post-2009-standard flat is confirmed (30-38 is roughly a third of 100). But my own recomputation of the "16 to 6 Ster" example does not hold up: insulation only reduces the *space-heating* share of demand (13,647 kWh input of the winter total of 16,935 kWh input); DHW, cooking and summer charcoal use (charcoal-wood ≈7.2 Rm) are unaffected by wall/roof insulation. Cutting only the space-heating share to a third and leaving the rest unchanged brings total wood use down from ~16 Ster to roughly 11 Ster, not 6. Recommend the writing session recompute this example or soften to "16 Ster to about 11," unless a supplementary reduction (e.g. moving DHW/cooking off wood too) is intended and should be stated explicitly.
H31 confirmed Story, The rocket; Bench 3; Numbers

Winiarski at Aprovecho in the 1980s; rocket stove named for its noise; 1:2:4 proportions; riser above 1,000 °C; 96 to 98 % combustion; three-stone fire 10 to 15 % to the pot

To check against
doc 21; Aprovecho history (Winiarski's rocket stove, about 1982)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 21 (Rocket Stove Construction Guide): "feed tube, burn tunnel, and heat riser is historically calculated as 1:2:4"; riser reaches "1000°C to 1200°C"; "high-performance rocket systems routinely achieve MCE values exceeding 96% to 98%"; "traditional three-stone fire... heat transfer efficiency is abysmal—often ranging from 10% to 15%"; Winiarski/Aprovecho history confirmed via engineering.oregonstate.edu/all-stories/dr-larry-winiarsk… (began developing the rocket stove in 1980, ten design principles codified by 1982)
Note
All figures and the "1980s" dating check out. Could not independently verify the "named for its noise" etymology claim; this is common lore in rocket-stove literature but I did not find a citable primary source for it — flagging as a minor unverified detail.
H32 confirmed Story, The rocket

Rocket mass heater: drum over riser, duct in cob bench, two-hour fire charges a tonne of cob for a day, exhaust at 120 °C

To check against
doc 21; Evans and Jackson, Rocket Mass Heaters
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 21: drum inverted over insulated riser as space-heating radiator; "if the exhaust gas temperature is allowed to drop below 120°C (250°F)... creosote"; operators must keep exhaust "at a minimum of 120°C (250°F)"
Note
Exhaust-temperature figure matches exactly. The "two-hour fire charges a tonne of cob for a day" detail does not appear in doc 21 (0 matches for "tonne") — it is consistent in spirit with the doc's general description of thermal-mass benches storing heat for extended radiant release, but the specific tonnage/duration numbers are unconfirmed by any source I could open; recommend citing Evans & J...
H33 confirmed Story, The rocket

Peter van den Berg's batch box, 2010s

To check against
doc 21; batchrocket.eu
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 21 (Peter van den Berg developed the "Batch Box" rocket core); batchrocket.eu/en/ and permies.com/donkey32.proboards.com forum threads showing active batch-box development and workshops through the 2010s (e.g. a 2017 workshop)
Note
"2010s" is a safe characterization; I could not pin down an exact founding year (some sources suggest development from around 2011-2013), but nothing contradicts "2010s."
H34 confirmed Story, Smoke, tar and the sweep

Schornsteinfeger: Prussian institution older than the fire brigade; inspects every flue on a fixed round; only a licensed sweep certifies a stove; dust limit in g/m³

To check against
Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz; Kehr- und Überprüfungsordnung; 1. BImSchV Stufe 2 (0.04 g/m³)
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
Schornsteinfeger guild history vs. Berlin Fire Brigade founding date (1 Feb 1851, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Fire_Brigade) — chimney-sweep guilds and Prussian royal ordinances on sweeping districts date to the 16th-17th centuries, well before 1851; doc 119 confirms "0.04 grams per cubic meter for fine dust" for 1. BImSchV Stufe 2
Note
The "older than the fire brigade" claim and the dust limit both check out against independent sources. Did not separately verify "only a licensed sweep certifies a stove" against the current Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz text, but this matches general knowledge of the Bezirksschornsteinfegermeister system.
H35 confirmed Story, Turn

Gas in Berlin kitchens from the 1900s, electricity 1930s, last coal kitchen stoves out in the 1980s; Ofensetzer and Köhler a few hundred people

To check against
Berlin gasworks and Bewag histories; Ofensetzer trade numbers (ZVSHK); Köhler numbers
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
Berlin gas supply began 1826 (public lighting) and expanded to private/domestic households through the 19th century, de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschichte_der_deutschen_Gasversorgung ; general electrification of stoves in the 1930s is well documented (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_stove); doc references not found for exact Berlin coal-kitchen-stove phase-out date or Ofensetzer/Köhler trade-body headcounts
Note
"Gas in Berlin kitchens from the 1900s" is plausible (gas cookers followed gas lighting through the later 19th/early 20th century) though Berlin's own gas rollout began earlier (1826) than domestic kitchen use; "electricity 1930s" matches the general European electrification pattern. I could not independently confirm "last coal kitchen stoves out in the 1980s" or specific Ofensetzer/Köhler trad...
H36 confirmed Bench 2

Cob oven build: bottle-and-slurry or vermiculite base, firebrick floor with a finger's gap, sand form 60 to 90 cm by 40 cm, 1:3 clay to sand 8 to 10 cm, straw layer 10 cm, door 63 %, dry a week, cure a week, fire 1.5 to 2 h until the dome goes white, flour test (10 s black = pizza, 30 s brown = bread), six loaves, a wheelbarrow of wood, roof it

To check against
Denzer, Build Your Own Earth Oven; doc 20 for the door and the mortar; the flour-test timings are the book's own
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 20 (vermiculite/CaSi insulating base, door height percentage, refractory mortar); Denzer, *Build Your Own Earth Oven*, described via transitionculture.org/essential-info/book-reviews/build-y… and other summaries — insulation layer made from clay slurry packed around glass bottles ("bottle-and-slurry"), or a clay/sand/perlite/vermiculite mix, is Denzer's standard method
Note
"Bottle-and-slurry or vermiculite base" matches Denzer's documented technique. The flour-test timings, exact sand-form dimensions and clay:sand ratios are explicitly the book's own per the row's own note — not separately verified beyond internal plausibility.
H37 confirmed Bench 3

Rocket core: 15 cm square, firebrick in 1:1 clay-sand mortar, house brick spalls, riser insulated with ash or perlite, 8 mm skirt doubles heat to the pot, 1 kg sticks in 30 min boils 10 l

To check against
doc 21 (skirt: 50 % to 26 % efficiency; ash not mentioned as insulation); the burn rate and boil time are the book's own
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 21: for a 10 cm channel, "narrowing the gap... to 6 mm or 8 mm" raises heat-transfer efficiency; widening the gap "causes heat transfer efficiency to plummet from near 50% down to 26%" (i.e. an 8 mm skirt roughly doubles efficiency vs. a wide gap, matching "doubles heat to the pot")
Note
As the row itself flags, doc 21 does not mention ash as a riser insulator (perlite/vermiculite are the documented insulators) — recommend replacing "ash or perlite" with "perlite (or vermiculite)" unless a separate source for ash insulation is found. The 1 kg-sticks/30-min/10-litre boil figures are the book's own per the row's note.
H38 amended Bench 4

Fell October to February by law; cut stools a hand above ground on a slant; cross-cut to 33 cm; split while green

To check against
BNatSchG § 39 (1 March to 30 September ban applies to hedges and shrubs; felling of forest trees is not banned by it: check and reword); doc 123
The verdict
AMENDED
Found
doc 123 quotes BNatSchG § 39 as banning felling "of trees, hedges, and living fences" outside the dormant season, but the statute itself (gesetze-im-internet.de/bnatschg_2009/__39.html) explicitly exempts trees standing within forests — confirmed independently via baumpflege-schlupek.de/ratgeber/wann-darf-man-baeume-faellen (species-protection §44 applies year-round in forests, but §39's March-September ban does not apply to proper forestry operations) and general guidance that October-February is the customary, gentler harvesting window rather than a strict statutory requirement
Note
Doc 123 itself mis-states the law here, and the book's "by law" wording inherits that error. October-to-February felling is real, well-established forestry *practice* (dormancy, sap reserves, ground conditions, and general species protection under §44), but citing BNatSchG §39 specifically for forest felling is incorrect, exactly as the row's own check-column anticipated. Proposed wording: "Fell October to February, the customary dormant-season window (state forest law and good practice, not itself compelled by BNatSchG §39, which exempts forest stands)." Cross-cut to 33 cm confirmed via doc 123 (TFZ log-length standard). "Cut a hand above ground on a slant" is standard coppice technique, not separately contradicted.
H39 confirmed Bench 4, step 4

Seasoning: one summer for ash and birch, two for beech and oak; cracks, hollow knock, no hiss; 20 % water; a third of the felling weight lost

To check against
LWF Merkblatt 20; fresh beech about 50 % water to 20 % is a loss of about 37 % of weight
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 123 (20% target moisture, seasoning tied to legal 1. BImSchV compliance); LWF-Merkblatt 20 (Bavarian State Institute for Forestry), waldwissen.net/de/waldwirtschaft/holz-und-markt/holzenerg… — "freshly cut wood... approximately 50%" moisture, dried to "below 20%" for legal combustion, ~6 months (spring/summer) for split wood, longer for unsplit and for denser hardwoods
Note
The "one summer... two for beech and oak" pattern matches LWF guidance that unsplit/denser wood needs much longer. Weight-loss check: converting 50% wet-basis moisture to 20% wet-basis moisture at constant dry mass gives a mass loss of about 37.5% — matching "a third of the felling weight lost" (and matching the row's own check-column figure of "about 37%") almost exactly.
H40 confirmed Bench 4, step 5

Coppice for a village of 300: about 100 ha hornbeam and field maple, 1.5 ha per household, up to 100 oaks per ha, 20 parcels of 5 ha, fence 3 years

To check against
doc 123 (1.5 ha per family of four; 75 households give 112 ha); reconcile with H28
The verdict
CONFIRMED
Found
doc 123: 1.5 ha per household (matches H28); "retain 7-8 oaks per coupe" across 20 coupes of 0.075 ha (≈ 93-107 oaks per hectare, i.e. "up to 100 oaks per ha"); "the woodlot is physically partitioned into 20 equal compartments (coupes or cants), each measuring 0.075 hectares"; Hornbeam (not field maple) is doc 123's chosen underwood species
Note
For "about 100 ha hornbeam and field maple" for a village of 300: 75 households × 1.5 ha = 112.5 ha, matching H28's reconciliation, not "100 ha" precisely — both rows should probably converge on the same number (112 ha, as the row's own check-column already suggests) rather than each rounding differently. Doc 123 uses Hornbeam as the primary species with Oak standards; field maple is not mentio...